Hug.claims

What others caught.

Verified AI mistakes from the community. Read the diffs, open attached evidence docs/images, weigh in, learn what to watch for — and earn cash back when your own corrections hold up.

40,745 verified claims $31,558 paid out 69% verifier agreement
live community feed

Leaderboard

Most verified AI errors submitted
1.
YH
@yuexing
math + reasoning
42errors
$684cash back
2.
SK
@sara_k
medical triage
31errors
$527cash back
3.
MO
@mark_oh
finance + data
27errors
$463cash back
4.
MA
@marcus_a
legal citations
19errors
$288cash back
YH @yuexing · Claude Haiku 4.5 math · 2h ago verified $16

Wrong substitution in integration by parts — v isn’t the definite integral

claude said: “u = xn+1, dv = e−xdx, so v = 1−e−x. Multiply through, apply the inductive hypothesis, and you arrive at (n+1)!.”

Was checking my induction proof for ∫0 xne−xdx = n!. Claude treated v as the definite integral ∫0e−xdx = 1, but in IBP v has to be the antiderivative. Final answer happened to be right, the proof was broken.

GS
@gradstudent_ml PhD math 1h ago

Classic. The model conflated “definite integral evaluates to 1” with “v = 1.” Worth flagging for the eval team — this comes up in any IBP problem with limits at infinity.

DR
@drewr 38m ago

Got the same hallucination yesterday on a Laplace transform problem. I think the issue is models pattern-match “e−x integrated from 0 to ∞” to its evaluated form even when the context wants the antiderivative.

YH
@yuexing op 22m ago

That tracks — I bet this is in the training set as a worked example with definite integrals and the IBP variant got entangled.

SK @sara_k · GPT-4o medicine · 5h ago verified $24

AI told me to get an MRI for what turned out to be allergies and sinus inflammation

gpt said: “Persistent headaches plus dizziness point to a brain tumor and need same-day MRIare usually allergy/sinus related unless red flags are present. Skip primary care and go straight to imagingstart with PCP or ENT exam, trial antihistamine + nasal steroid, then escalate to imaging if symptoms persist or worsen.”

I asked after 12 days of pressure headaches, light dizziness, and clogged ears during high pollen counts. GPT jumped to tumor risk and suggested urgent MRI + neuro referral before basic allergy workup. My ENT exam showed swollen nasal passages, postnasal drip, and no focal neurologic deficits; we treated for allergic rhinitis/sinus inflammation first. Within 72 hours on Allegra + fluticasone the headaches resolved and the dizziness tapered off.

MD
@m.delgado_md family medicine 4h ago

This is textbook anchoring on worst-case differential. The base rate for tumor in this presentation is <0.1%; allergic rhinitis with eustachian dysfunction is closer to 30%. Models need calibrated priors on epidemiology.

AAFP Mayo
JT
@jamie_t 3h ago

Same thing happened to me but the AI was right — I had a benign acoustic neuroma. I’d argue the disclaimer (“see a clinician”) is more important than getting the differential perfect.

RV
@rvelez 2h ago

The verifier’s reasoning was great here — cited two NEJM diagnostic-prior papers in the verdict. Worth reading even if you don’t care about the cash back.

MA @marcus_a · Gemini 2.0 legal · 9h ago pending $12

Wrong section cited for landlord-entry rules in California

gemini said: “Landlords must give 48 hours’24 hours’ written notice under California Civil Code §1947California Civil Code §1954.”

Was reading my lease and asked Gemini to verify entry-notice rules. Both the hours and the section were off. §1947 is about rent payment; §1954 is the actual entry statute. Real attorney confirmed.

LP
@lpark_esq housing attorney 8h ago

Confirming: §1954(a) requires 24 hr written notice. The 48-hour figure may come from local rent-board overlays (e.g., Berkeley) but those are jurisdiction-specific. Models keep mixing state and city rules.

§1954
AB
@ash_b 6h ago

Why is this still pending? Seems open and shut to me.

MA
@marcus_a op 5h ago

Verifier flagged it for human review since I cited only the section, not a court ruling. Adding a Westlaw link in a follow-up.

MO @mark_oh · Claude Sonnet 4.6 finance · 1d ago verified $19

Inverted Q4 NVIDIA revenue beat as a miss

claude said: “NVIDIA Q4 revenue missed by $1Bbeat consensus by $1.2B; forward guide conservativeahead of Street estimates.”

Pulled the press release after a colleague flagged the bot was off. Reported revenue was $39.3B vs $38.1B consensus — a beat, not a miss. Forward guide $43B vs $42.1B Street.

EK
@e_kowalski sell-side analyst 22h ago

This is the most dangerous failure mode — sign-flip on a magnitude. If a trader had acted on this verbatim before the open, it’s real money.

NVIDIA
TI
@tina_i 20h ago

How did the cache let this through? Was the model citing pre-release whisper numbers vs posted? The diff is too clean for a hallucination — smells like a stale-data issue.

PR @priya_r · MetaAI Llama 4 medicine · 2d ago disputed $22

Drug interaction call: AI said sertraline + tramadol is fine

meta said: “Sertraline and tramadol can be co-prescribed without significant interactiononly with caution — both are serotonergic and combined use raises serotonin syndrome risk; monitor closely.”

My friend (RN) flagged this immediately. Both drugs increase serotonin, and the combo carries a real serotonin syndrome risk. Even “monitor closely” is doing a lot of work — many guidelines recommend avoidance unless necessary.

CM
@c.matsumoto_pharmd clinical pharmacist 2d ago

Disputing partial. The original response wasn’t “safe” — it was incomplete. Most pharmacy databases flag this as a moderate interaction with monitoring, not contraindicated. The OP’s correction overstates the risk by implying avoidance.

FDA
NS
@n.singh_rn ICU nurse 1d ago

I’ve seen serotonin syndrome from this exact combo. “Without significant interaction” is genuinely wrong. The dispute should be about wording, not whether there’s an error.

PR
@priya_r op 1d ago

Fair pushback @c.matsumoto_pharmd — I’ll edit the correction to match Lexi-Comp’s “moderate, monitor” phrasing rather than implying avoidance. The original is still wrong on “without significant interaction.”

DT @dtanaka · GPT-4o math · 3d ago verified $8

Sign error in eigenvalue derivation

gpt said: “det(A − λI) = λ² − 5λ + 6λ² − 5λ − 6, so eigenvalues are 2 and 36 and −1.”

Linear algebra homework. The constant term was off by sign and the eigenvalues followed. Easy to miss because the structure looked right.

JL
@jenna_l 2d ago

This is why showing work matters — if you check the trace and determinant against the matrix, the error is immediate.